Wis.-Green Bay
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,598  Kimberly Hurst SO 22:16
1,643  Sarah Mauel SR 22:19
2,628  Alexandra Kershner FR 23:39
2,656  Breanna Suess JR 23:44
2,911  Rachel Crites SR 24:25
2,944  Taylor Stelter SR 24:33
2,973  Erin Schmitt SO 24:42
3,190  Heather Plough SO 25:51
3,246  Marissa Cherek JR 26:16
National Rank #284 of 339
Great Lakes Region Rank #31 of 34
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 31st at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Kimberly Hurst Sarah Mauel Alexandra Kershner Breanna Suess Rachel Crites Taylor Stelter Erin Schmitt Heather Plough Marissa Cherek
Joe Piane Notre Dame Invitational (Gold) 10/02 1373 22:14 22:35 23:38 23:27 24:03 24:25 24:35 25:47 26:18
Bradley 'Pink' Classic Invitational (Red) 10/16 1382 21:52 22:03 23:21 23:46 24:37 24:42 24:44 26:26 25:46
Horizon League Championships 10/31 1385 22:24 22:23 23:54 23:26 24:29 24:15 24:35 25:26 26:46
Great Lakes Region Championships 11/13 1439 22:40 22:21 23:50 24:49 24:32 24:53 24:55





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 30.8 946 0.0 0.2 0.9 4.4 10.8 24.0 30.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Kimberly Hurst 147.6
Sarah Mauel 151.4
Alexandra Kershner 210.3
Breanna Suess 211.9
Rachel Crites 226.4
Taylor Stelter 229.0
Erin Schmitt 231.2




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 0.0% 0.0 25
26 0.2% 0.2 26
27 0.9% 0.9 27
28 4.4% 4.4 28
29 10.8% 10.8 29
30 24.0% 24.0 30
31 30.1% 30.1 31
32 19.6% 19.6 32
33 7.5% 7.5 33
34 2.4% 2.4 34
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0